My previous two posts have probably given you the hint that I'm pretty passionate about accessibility, especially when it comes to accessibility into homes. But let's be honest about a few things:
1) At the international level, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities does mention the need for accessibility in housing, as part of the CRPD. The World Health Organization has identified over 1 billion individuals facing the challenges of a disability internationally. And, the challenges of aging populations are an international concern, not isolated to certain countries.
2) At the federal level, Canada ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2010; we are a signatory country of this convention. Statistics Canada identified nearly 3 million Canadians with mobility disabilities in their Participation and Activity Limitation survey, which formed part of the 2006 Census. Statistics Canada has already identified that there are 9.6 million baby boomers according to the 2011 Census, which started becoming seniors in 2011 and will continue until 2031, at a rate of over 1,100 per day (nation wide) for those twenty years. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, in their five-part series entitled "Housing for Older Canadians", identified that over 80% of the 55+ demographic wishes to age at home.
3) At the provincial level, Ontario created the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act in 2005, with the primary goal of a fully accessible Ontario by January 1, 2025. Anyone who has been following the AODA sees that standards have been slow to be created and have brought forward many questions pertaining to interpretation of these standards; enforcement of these standards has also been questionable. Most concerning to me is the exemption of houses from accessibility legislation. In section 3.8 of the Ontario Building Code, section 188.8.131.52 exempts most houses from the need to comply to these barrier-free requirements. The only section that offers some barrier-free features in a private dwelling is found in section 184.108.40.206, which deals with buildings taller than three storeys, or larger than 600m2. Although we live in a province that has a twenty year goal of a fully accessible province, and a province that spends hundreds of millions of dollars yearly on aging at home services, we offer next to nothing in barrier-free housing options, even though the majority of our aging population wishes to age at home, and will need these features as they age.
4) At the municipal level, the City of Ottawa was granted the certification of an age-friendly city by the World Health Organization in 2013. Ottawa also has an Older Adult Plan, which it hopes will respond to the needs of our aging population. And Ottawa does offer a portion of it's Affordable Housing inventory with either VisitAble or Barrier-Free units. So, some things are happening at the municipal level, but much more needs to be done.
As it stands, homes that contain some type of barrier-free features (whether it be VisitAbility, Universal Design, or full accessibility) are isolated mainly to the following areas:
-CoOperative Housing has been offering some of their inventory with barrier-free features for decades (they deserve some praise as being the pioneers when it comes to offering barrier-free options in housing).
-Some provincially funded group homes and other facilities have barrier-free features; this typically handles the "public" aspect of barrier-free requirements.
-Some units in private high-rises and private seniors' facilities have barrier-free features.
-Habitat for Humanity is getting more involved in barrier-free house plans, as part of their projects, especially on an international level.
-Some City of Ottawa affordable housing has VisitAble or barrier-free units in their inventory.
-Some custom homes have been built with barrier-free features (which includes my home in Greely).
So it's not all bad. I don't want to sound "doom and gloom" but we most certainly can do better for our individuals who need the features now, and the many more who will as our population ages. It's time for consumers to start asking for these features when purchasing new homes, or when renovating your current home, in order to meet your current and future needs. Not being proactive in your housing options could be problematic. I highly recommend that you start your research now to avoid being caught off-guard if a crisis comes for yourself, or for someone you love.
Please have a look at my Facebook page entitled "Accessibility and Aging at Home", which I feel will offer information and options for those of you who are interested in this topic.
Friday, May 09, 2014
ONTARIO REGULATION 332/12, section 220.127.116.11(4) of the ontario Building code
(4) In a Group C major occupancy apartment building, not less than 10% of all residential suites shall be provided with a barrier-free path of travel from the suite entrance door to,
(a) the doorway to at least one bedroom at the same level, and
(b) the doorway to at least one bathroom,
(i) having an area not less than 4.5 m2 at the same level, and
(ii) conforming to Sentence 18.104.22.168.(1).
As of January 1, 2015: Ontario Regulation 368/13, Section 22.214.171.124
(5) In a Group C major occupancy apartment building, not less than 15% of all suites of residential occupancy shall be provided with a barrier-free path of travel from the suite entrance door into the following rooms and spaces that shall be located at the same level as the barrier-free path of travel:
(a) at least one bedroom,
(b) at least one bathroom conforming to Sentence (6),
(c) a kitchen or kitchen space, and
(d) a living room or space.
(6) Bathrooms required by Clause (5)(b) shall,
(a) contain a lavatory,
(b) contain a water closet,
(c) contain a bathtub or a shower,
(d) have wall reinforcement installed in conformance with Sentence 126.96.36.199.(1), and
(e) be designed to permit a wheelchair to turn in an open space not less than 1 500 mm in diameter.
(7) The number of suites described in Sentence (5) having 1, 2 or 3 or more bedrooms shall be in proportion to the number of suites of residential occupancy having 1, 2 or 3 or more bedrooms in the remainder of the building.
(8) The suites described in Sentence (5) shall be distributed among storeys that are required by Article 188.8.131.52. to have a barrier-free path of travel, having regard to the height of the suite above grade.
What is meant by barrier-free path of travel:
184.108.40.206. Barrier-Free Path of Travel
(1) Except as required in Sentence (4) and except as permitted in Subsection 3.8.3., every barrier-free path of travel shall provide an unobstructed width of at least 1 100 mm for the passage of wheelchairs.
(2) Interior and exterior walking surfaces that are within a barrier-free path of travel shall,
(a) have no opening that will permit the passage of a sphere more than 13 mm in diam,
(b) have any elongated openings oriented approximately perpendicular to the direction of travel,
(c) be stable, firm and slip-resistant,
(d) be bevelled at a maximum slope of 1 in 2 at changes in level not more than 13 mm, and
(e) be provided with sloped floors or ramps at changes in level more than 13 mm.
(3) A barrier-free path of travel is permitted to include ramps, passenger elevators or other platform equipped passenger elevating devices to overcome a difference in level.
(4) Every barrier-free path of travel less than 1 600 mm in width shall be provided with an unobstructed space not less than 1 600 mm in width and 1 600 mm in length located not more than 30 m apart.
(5) Where the headroom of an area in a barrier-free path of travel is reduced to less than 1 980 mm, a guardrail or other barrier with its leading edge at or below 680 mm from the floor shall be provided.
What are the classifications:
(a) used for major occupancies classified as,
(i) Group A, assembly occupancies,
(ii) Group B, care or detention occupancies,
(iii) Group F, Division 1, high hazard industrial occupancies, or
(b) exceeding 600 m2 in building area or exceeding three storeys in building height and used for major occupancies classified as,
(i) Group C, residential occupancies,
(ii) Group D, business and personal services occupancies,
(iii) Group E, mercantile occupancies, or
(iv) Group F, Divisions 2 and 3, medium hazard industrial occupancies and low hazard industrial occupancies.
Good morning Mr. Gervais;
You are correct that Group C Buildings are residential however the term condominium is not used in the Building Code for the simple reason that ‘condominium’ is not a type of building. It is a form of tenure, notwithstanding that the term condominium is used widely by the general public to describe residential apartment buildings that are owned by the residents. In fact many different building types may be condominiums including single detached houses (think gated communities), townhouses, retail malls and industrial malls.
In the Building Code apartment building is the term used for all multi-unit residential buildings. The Building Code barrier-free design requirements apply equally to all new multi-unit buildings whether the tenure is rental or condominium ownership. The Building Code sets minimum construction standards for all buildings. It does not have one set of standards for rental buildings and another for condominium buildings. The differences that building users may see between the types of building designs are established by developers who can and frequently build to higher than minimum standards depending on who they are targeting to live in the building.
The Group C Residential category also includes hotels, motels, student residences/dormitories, convents, monasteries, residential schools, homeless shelters, shelters for women, open and semi-secure youth detention facilities and hostels. All of these, depending on the size and design of the building, are subject to the Code’s barrier-free design requirements. That category might also include adult apartment buildings such as a senior’s retirement apartment building but if it is a long-term care facility, that would be a Group B which also must meet barrier-free requirements.
Group F, Division 1 Buildings are high hazard industrial buildings where barrier-free requirements do not apply to the industrial component of the building. But if a Group F, Div. 1 building includes an office component, that portion of the building would be considered a Group D and barrier-free design requirements
I hope this helps.
Nancy P. Smith, OAA
Coordinator, Code Development
Building and Development Branch
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
777 Bay Street, 2nd Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E5
Phone: (416) 585-7542
Thursday, May 01, 2014
If anyone is interested to know more about the Canadian Centre on Disability Studies, here is their website: http://disabilitystudies.ca/. You can also visit their Facebook page at: https://www.facebook.com/visitablehousingcanada.
As a resident of Ontario, I would like to share my concerns about our government's continued exemption of houses from any form of accessibility regulation. The Ontario Building Code has a section that deals with barrier-free design (section 3.8) but it begins this section by identifying which areas are exempt, which includes homes. The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, which has the goal of an accessible Ontario by January 1, 2025, also exempts houses because they are focusing the legislation on the Design of Public Spaces. Whether it be the Ontario Building Code or the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, the public needs to realize that there already is a significant shortage of housing options for individuals with mobility challenges, and this will only get a worse as we deal with the aging of our baby boomers (between 2011 and 2031), which number in the millions (9.6 million in Canada according to Statistics Canada). I think it's time that we all realize that current construction techniques create barriers instead of removing them, and this needs to change. VisitAbility is one of those options which would offer an inclusive approach to the design and building of new homes, and it would also fulfill our obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which Canada signed in 2010. It would also support Ontario's promotion of aging at home, which is being funded with hundreds of millions of dollars per year (330 million in 2010).
I don't want to imply that there are no options, because there are. The CoOperative Housing sector has been offering barrier-free apartments and townhomes for decades; some affordable housing is either VisitAble or barrier-free (Ottawa is an example); some custom homes have these features; and since 2006, new apartment buildings in Ontario have been required to offer some VisitAble and barrier-free units. But more needs to be done. And this is why I'm promoting VisitAbility in new housing, as a minimum, in order to address our current housing concerns. Ample research has been done to prove the merit and cost-effectiveness of VisitAbility, and it's quite popular in States like Illinois, Georgia, Arizona and Texas and it's now gaining momentum in Winnipeg. My hope is that developers and builders catch up with what's already happening in order to offer more options than currently exist. There needs to be a cultural shift away from thinking that universal design and/or barrier-free design are only for people with disabilities and move toward thinking that realizes that it benefits everyone: parents with young children, moving and delivery companies, emergency services, and our ability to welcome anyone into our homes, as examples.
If anyone is interested in the topic of aging in place, please have a look at my Facebook page, which I feel should offer information: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Accessibility-and-Aging-at-Home/551546931542954. I could talk about this topic for hours so I'll direct you to my Facebook page as an introduction to this topic that I'm very passionate about; there are a number of albums that will substantiate my statements in this blog.